Originally Posted by
Chris516
Since when does FRAP make a cyclist think the 'P' in FRAP means absolutely instead of 'practicable' or 'possible'?
By the use of either one of those words in the law, law enforcement courtesy of state legislatures' continually keeps a chasm of ambiguity(instead of specificity) in the state's traffic code open for misuse of interpretation by law enforcement thinking it means 'absolute'. Because what is 'practicable' or 'possible', is not a judgment call on the part of the motorist....it is a judgement call on the part of the cyclist!!!!
Not quite. The judgement call is initially by the cyclist. Then it may be disputed by a police officer. It is finally settled, if things go that far, by a court.