Thread: 165-170
View Single Post
Old 08-06-11 | 12:33 PM
  #12  
max5480's Avatar
max5480
Rhythm is rhythm
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 1
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by xavier853
Interesting. I am switching for the same reason but from 165 to 170. 170 seem to fit me better
you're switching to longer cranks so you can spin your legs faster going downhill?
what's your logic?
longer radius = larger circumference = longer distance your legs have to travel in the same amount of time (assuming cog and chainring remain the same) = more work
max5480 is offline  
Reply