View Single Post
Old 08-10-11, 07:48 AM
  #15  
Cyclaholic
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
 
Cyclaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1589 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times in 365 Posts
Originally Posted by bluefoxicy
This.

Cars can't legally run stop signs, and cars get ticketed for illegally running stop signs.

Don't tell me it doesn't matter that you're on a bike, and that the law that says you can't run a stop sign is stupid, and so you're going to do it anyway, and you shouldn't be ticketed for it. You are going to pay the fine. They can't take your license away for it, but you can go ahead and make the city rich if you like.
To apply the same penalty to cyclists and drivers is asinine. Driver runs a red, hits cyclist, cyclist dies. Cyclist runs a red, hits car, cyclist dies. Can you see a pattern there? ...to equate a cyclist running a red with a driver running a red is like equating someone assaulting you by tapping you with a feather with someone beating you almost to death with a baseball bat. Both an assault, yes, but deserving of the exact same penalty? No.
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
Cyclaholic is offline