View Single Post
Old 08-31-11, 09:46 AM
  #8  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Big-big is the more conservative approach, particularly if you set it using the largest cog you will ever use on that chain. Small-small assumes you have a rear derailleur capable of wraping up the entire tooth count and if you do, it does mean big-big will work too.

The problem with small-small is if you have a total-tooth count setup greater than your rear derailleur can handle. For example, I routinely substitute a 26T granny for the OEM 30T granny on road triple cranksets and that gives me a total tooth count greater than the rd will handle. I set the chain at big-big and realize it will go slack in small-small but that not damaging and not a problem. Not being able to handle bib-big can do a lot of damage if an inadvertant shift to that combination is tried.
HillRider is offline