View Single Post
Old 06-30-05 | 10:00 PM
  #36  
pgoat's Avatar
pgoat
Batüwü Griekgriek
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,927
Likes: 7

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Originally Posted by Lance.Legstrong
what a dumb thread. Obviously it depends on the person, and how much money he has. If you were bill gates, and you LOVED cycling. EVERYTHING is worth upgrading. If you are my dad, and would never pay more than 70 bucks for a bike. NOTHING is worth upgrading.
I disagree, everytime you replace the tires or tubes you have the chance to upgrade. But there is abig difference between choosing a replacement for a part that NEEDS to be replaced, and pulling parts off just for the sake of adding some bling bling. Nothing WRONG with doing that but from an economic standpoint, it's not the most frugal thing to do. Since not all bikes/wallets etc are equal, this person was simply asking for some feedback on their particular model.

But I think the question that started this thread is one most of us encounter as bike enthusiasts. Wondering how much better performance we can squeeze out of our steeds with that magic part or two. It's true we'd all do better to improve our own performance through diet, training, etc but at some point you have to consider your equipment too.

In some cases, a specific upgrade to a specific bike may very well NOT be worth doing. Even if you're Bill Gates, you might be better off getting a new bike if your goal is better performance. Even the world's richest dork can only ride one bike at a time.
pgoat is offline  
Reply