View Single Post
Old 09-16-11 | 06:26 AM
  #21  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Originally Posted by dgodave
I respect that the OP has considered what he wants.
.
But I have to wonder why? The big saddle bag seems inherently floppy, high up, possibly awkward. I just wonder whats the attraction.
.
Well, speaking for myself, here....

The attraction for me starts with the premise that with a "vintage" bike, I like to find the best compromise between the original style of the bike and whatever utilitarian purpose I will put it to. So while a touring bike from the 70's or 80's looks best with a Jim Blackburn rack over the back wheel, an English lightweight from the 40's looks best with a saddle bag. The saddle bag on my Fothergill, as shown, has the right look. The way it attaches, and rests on the Park bag support, is not period correct by any means; but that's not the point. The top of the bag is reenforced with two pieces of 1/2" x 1/8" aluminum bar stock. A cable clamp (a U-shaped steel rod, threaded at each end) goes around each saddle rail and through the two aluminum bars. So the bag is very securely mounted to the saddle rails; it does not flop around at all.
rhm is offline  
Reply