Originally Posted by
LemondFanForeve
That was my point in earlier threads, how do we know who was/wasnt clean?
You dont have yo be proven guilty to be guilty. Perfect example is Roger Clemens. Suspicions are there & have been for awhile.
If your talking about the past, we won't ever know with absolute certainty. That's why a witch hunt will become pointless. Is it fair to only be able to punish those who happen to have an old random blood sample still intact in a lab and let the majority of riders who don't go free? I don't think so.
Going forward maybe the 'biological passport' deal will help keep a better record. But if there is money to be made by cheating people will try it and some will get away with.
As for condemning people off of suspicions.....seriously?