Old 10-03-11 | 08:42 AM
  #51  
ddgunter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Southern New Brunswick Canada

Bikes: 1987 Finnelli MTB, Hoping for 2011 Norco Cabot

Originally Posted by Gus Riley
Maybe not super useful, but my 54cm LHT equipped with front, and aft racks, hardware for a handlebar bag, 3 bottle cages, 26" wheels with 1.5" marathons, fenders, tail light, two headlights, and a Brooks Flyer (heavy) weighs in at 33.6 (or .8, I can't remember) pounds.
I know weight is not a primary factor for touring bikes but I did notice that the safari (29.9 lbs) is heavier than the randonee (28.1 lbs), and that the most mentioned con is "heavy". Both come with rear racks which I assume is included in the weights. Just wondering if in the big picture it really made much difference. I assume the safari is heavier because it simply has a longer frame for the same given size in order to accommodate the closer hand position of the butterfly bars.
ddgunter is offline  
Reply