Old 10-04-11, 12:50 AM
  #3  
SurlyLaika
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vuduchyld5
I don't really see what there would be to argue about? There is no difference- Your weight+ bike weight+ clothing/gear = total weight. You already stated some of the reasons why a lighter bike is more efficient...And if you want to lose weight- RIDE the $%&* outta your bike and have a healthy diet, simply put.
I guess what I'm saying is the 50 grams taken off the bike by buying a carbon seat post for $70 seems like nothing compared to a single lb of dead weight on your own body. I know being lighter is better, in general. I meant to ask what is the most efficient way to shave weight and get faster, though. If you have the money to drop on carbon or titanium, by all means...but I personally don't have that kind of money and I just like some of my heavier components. No need to argue, I just want to hear different opinions on the topic. For you, it just seems to be a closed subject.


Edit: Does anyone own the Time Crunched Cyclist? Is it worth buying?
SurlyLaika is offline