BF would be minus one member if it wasn't for early screening and testing. In 05, my PSA was a 2.4 and I was told that we would do a wait and see approach because the digital exam felt more like an enlarged prostate then cancer. A year later, my PSA was at 4.7 and the prostate was the same size as it was the previous year. Three months later, my hematologist took it again and it was 6.1. The biopsy showed a Gleason Score of +8 (out of 10). I hope that all of you guys that feel that these tests are a waste of time have your house in order. Has it ever occurred to anyone that the insurance industry may have been the backers of this project and the findings were biased in their favor? I think too many of us are willing to agree with these medical findings before we know all of the information because we don't want to think of the possibility that it can happen to us. I'm here to tell you, it does. One study does not make it gospel.