View Single Post
Old 10-09-11 | 04:42 PM
  #37  
springs
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: PA, USA

Bikes: Emonda SLR, Salsa Warbird carbon

Originally Posted by HawkOwl
A classic case of difffering objectives combined with trying to draw conclusions for the specific from the general. The study was looking at the benefit/risk factors for the general population and trying to make recommendations on the cost/benefit factors for the general population. That is far different than examining a single afffected individual. Grossly oversimplified, their recommendations make economic sense to the population as a whole. But, I'm not the population as a whole. I am the population of one, me.

This is not the only place where what makes sense from a statistical sense for the entire population makes no sense to individuals as long as we can afford to treat individuals as individuals and not just as members of the collective whole.
I think you misread the study. By your reasoning, no medical studies or analyses could be worthwhile.
springs is offline  
Reply