View Single Post
Old 10-10-11 | 03:16 PM
  #47  
jonwvara's Avatar
jonwvara
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 943
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1973-4 Gitane Tour de France, early 1970's Lejeune, 1970 Italvega Super Speciale, 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker 26

Originally Posted by Andycapp
Shouldn't need it. I got the measurment off my SL 104 ring, came out to 107.5 or so. I got the CAM side of things last night. Now I just have to get some material and some free time in the machine! There's a fair amount of real-state in the triangle area over the inner bolt circle. Should we skelatize this. Or we could do some "drillium" work on the whole thing. Or custom "panto" work.... Thoughts?
I'm a pretty utilitarian guy, so my opinion is that "skeletalization" of the ring or any other elaborate treatments are likely to be more trouble than they're worth, given that this is a middle ring--it's not like it's a main design feature. Also, I think we want it to be pretty robust, since the load on the granny gets transmitted through it. Trying to lighten it too much might reduce its stiffness enough to cause problems.
I say build a simple one, see if it works, then get fancy later if it seems worth it.
Of course, you can also design something by making a prototype that's as light as it can possibly be, run it until it breaks, make a new one that's stronger in the broken area, and repeat as many times as necessary until it no longer breaks. That works, too, but it costs more and takes longer.
JV
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash

Last edited by jonwvara; 10-10-11 at 08:18 PM. Reason: missing punctuation is an abomination
jonwvara is offline  
Reply