Originally Posted by
kf9yr
As I look at the original post I see 3 statements
1. I agree a heavier wheel with more weight on the rim is harder to "wind up" as there is a higher moment of inertia. This also works in reverse when you're braking. I have a 1200g set of carbon wheels that I can absolutely feel accellerating easier from stoplights than my much heavier Ultegra wheelset. This wouldn't make much of a difference in a TT but when you need to accellerate and decelerate or climb a lot I don't see how it can't make an improvement, especially on a long ride.
2. More weight at the outside of the wheel would of course make more of a gyroscopic effect but it would be felt more on a downhill as the rotational speed of the wheels is much slower on the uphill than on the downhill. I would go with the lighter wheels for climbing as I wouldn't have to pedal the extra weight up the hill.
3. If the weight around the circumference of the rim wasn't very close to equal you would have quite a scare on a fast descent. There isn't any weight redistribution going on or the wheels would feel like they were trying to buck you off at 40 mph.
If there wasn't a discernable, measurable difference with lighter wheels the pros wouldn't all be riding on them during their races.
I think the point about diminishing return when it comes to wheel weight and this encompasses what some average amateurs spend on carbon wheels...is we ain't pros. Pros care about tenths of a second. The fat guy riding a Cervelo with $2K carbon wheelset shouldn't and will be passed by the fit senior on a CAAD10 every time with 2000g Al wheels.
Should the goal be to find a 'lightish' wheelset that is decently stiff? Of course but...a hundred grams of wheel weight for another $500-700 is a waste of money for the amateur. Truth about carbon wheels is most buy them more for the looks than the performance...yes they perform well as they should but so does a 1500 gram Al wheelset for $1K less.