Old 11-05-11, 11:06 AM
  #44  
jamesdak 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,712

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 157 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2336 Post(s)
Liked 5,094 Times in 1,802 Posts
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
You should include the lights if you want to really track how you're improving. It makes a big difference - you might think it's the same because you're cutting out stoppage, but that stoppage is big time rest, even if it's only 2 mins per 60 min total. I can ride a full 1.3 mph faster for the entire 60min average if I don't count the 2-3min of light stops. That's such a big difference that it's an entirely different class of rider.
?? I must be missing something here. If the clock and speed calculation stops when you stop and then start again when moving how is this not accurate. My computer calculates average moving speed not an average based on overall time of the session.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is offline