Originally Posted by
SurlyLaika
I thought I mentioned the setback. Both seat posts have setback, I think 23 and 25mm, almost identical. The pictures look similar to mine as opposed to zero setback seat posts. So I figured I should just stick to what is similar to what I already have. I want to know, though, how setback or the lack of it affects the fit. Why would someone want a zero setback seat post?
I know the CC's top tube tends to run a bit longer than the top tubes on other similar 'cross jack-of-all-trade bikes like the Bianchi Volpe and Salsa Casseroll. I would think a zero setback would place the saddle closer to the handlebars.
People want zero setback posts for the same reason they want large setback seatposts...to adjust the fit.
Originally Posted by
SurlyLaika
Would a lay back seat post place me farther from the handlebars? That's already a problem for me with the longer than typical top tube on the CC. Is 25mm of setback more moderate or just the same thing as a lay back seat post? A zero setback would put me closer, right?
Given what you've said elsewhere, a zero setback post might be in order for your needs. It pulls you an inch closer to the stem and shortens your reach. Since a new frame is an expensive proposition, a inexpensive zero setback post might be worth the investment. Pricepoint has
one for $18. If that fixes your reach problem, it's worth the investment.