View Single Post
Old 12-28-11 | 09:58 AM
  #4  
javal's Avatar
javal
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Örebro, Sweden

Bikes: Monark sportser 1970, Monark sportser 1970ish, Monark folder, Mustand 1985, Monark Tempo 1999, Monark 318 1975, Crescent 319 1979, Crescent 325 c:a 1965, Crescent Starren 2002 (hybrid/sport), Nordstjernan 1960`s cruiser.

Well, like everything, this could be argued. Its hard to get a grip of how much your bike was damaged. Sure, components can be fragile but they are not kid glove fragile. Most components, my experience on Shimano that is, are sturdy and tough if frequently and properly looked after. On my hybrid from 2002 the Acera (considered low end) rear derailleur is my most impressive piece of cycling gadget in my house (and I´ve got stuff people would pay handsomely for). I´ve thrown just about everything at it, even converted to drops and made compatible with Sora brifters, and it still works like new.
Firstly, its about the builder of the bike - if they got a hunch as to what the bike should do or be, they built it rightly without un-necessary bling-bling. Secondly, maintenance will never harm any kind of technical device. A ten year old bike isnt by any means old. It should withstand some beating.
javal is offline  
Reply