View Single Post
Old 01-10-12 | 12:23 PM
  #17  
staehpj1's Avatar
staehpj1
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,037
Likes: 827
From: Tallahassee, FL

Bikes: Several

Originally Posted by Niles H.
In other words, even lighter bikes can be plenty strong for (reasonably gentle) ultralight (UL) and sub-ultralight (SUL) touring.

The question here is, How light can one go? What are the (safe) limits, while still maintaining sufficient performance and reliability?
I don't know, but cost would become pretty prohibitive to my frugal mind. A 17 pound road bike is already too expensive to suit me.

That said I think carbon fiber would be a fine material to make touring bikes of whatever weight from. I personally would love to have a lighter bike, but not at any cost. The thing is that:
  1. The demand would be pretty low for the lighter weight CF touring bikes given that there are not that many folks touring really light.
  2. The demand would probably be pretty low for heavier duty CF touring bikes because the heavy touring market tends to be a pretty traditional market (and small).
  3. The low demand for both would mean low production and high cost.
__________________
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1


staehpj1 is offline  
Reply