Originally Posted by
buzzman
This weirds me out. Any thought given to the idea that a cyclist may have been hit by a car and was rushed to the hospital? The bike may have been left to be picked up later. Even if the cyclist might never ride it again isn't that somewhere between stealing and tampering with evidence?
Good point, but one has to wonder that if it was potential evidence why wasn't it taken into "custody" by one of the officers that had responded to the crash? Or why wasn't a an officer left to "protect" it from theft?