Originally Posted by
staehpj1
There is a huge range in what folks choose to take, so there is no "one size fits all" answer.
I'd forget the 4500 cubic inch backpack. That is way more than I would want to put on top of the rear rack.
Unless you are willing to go
really light, I would recommend getting some panniers. If money is tight (or maybe even if it isn't) Nashbar or Performance waterproofs are inexpensive and work OK.
If you are willing to pack pretty light, you could go with smallish panniers on the front and your tent on the rear rack. I did that on my last trip and it worked very well for a base gear weight of 22 pounds (excluding food, water, and fuel).
If you are carry a moderate load (30-40 pounds) rear only panniers is probably OK.
If carrying a heavy load (>40 pounds) 4 panniers are probably preferred.
If going really light (<20 pounds) you can do well with a large saddle bag (search for Nun's posts) or sil-nylon stuff sacks strapped on the rear rack.
I'd also use a handlebar bag with any of those options.
I am not a trailer fan so I'll let others comment on them.
Also if interesed in going very light check out
my article on the crazy guy site.
+1
I've toured twice with a Bob trailer. It worked great. If a trailer allows you to tour, or is the best option, go for it and don't look back. I prefer racks and panniers, however. I carry a big load and like four panniers and a handlebar bag, with some stuff on top of both racks (I have Jandd in front with a platform.)
If touring is something you'll be doing over and over, buying good equipment makes economic sense, because once you spend the money you'll have the stuff for a long time (a lifetime?) However, if you can't afford the best, or if you're not sure you'll become a lifelong tourer, go ahead and put together the best rig you can with your given budget, and go out and try it. You can always upgrade later if you find yourself hooked, and find yourself coveting better stuff.