View Single Post
Old 01-31-12 | 08:44 AM
  #25  
wahoonc's Avatar
wahoonc
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Originally Posted by staehpj1
+1
Purely personal preference, but... A few advantages I find to one big pocket are:
  1. Panniers of this style are more easily made waterproof so in most cases they are.
  2. Panniers of this style are more easily made lighter weight.
  3. There are fewer places to look for stuff. I can find things faster than if I have to remember which pocket they are in.
  4. More pockets actually wind up holding less stuff for the same volume and much less for the weight because the space gets used less efficiently when items don't fill the pocket.
  5. When things shift in categories or priorities of need during the trip pocket sizes stay the same. Ziplocs or stuff sacks in a large pocket make this a non issue.
I have toured with both styles and definitely didn't like a lot of pockets or fancy dodads.
So we are using the same system...just a different description

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply