View Single Post
Old 02-04-12, 01:22 PM
  #9  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Delmarva
I ride 2 bikes, one has a triple and the other a double. So far I haven't noticed the clunkiness in shifting but the rings are apparently well matched for shifting.
I have triples on all my current bikes but have ridden doubles a fair bit too. I find no differences in the shifting between the two larger rings on a triple than between the two rings on a double. The argument that modern triples are inherently "clunkier" than modern doubles seems unjustified to me. Adjusted properly they shift just as well.
HillRider is offline