Old 02-07-12, 05:34 PM
  #17  
18hockey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LemondFanForeve
Significant Evidence=proof

Nothing to be objective about really. Having read between the lines, thats essentially what they said. Doesnt matter if the charges were dropped, there was still significant evidence to allow it to get to where it did. WADA must feel there is, or they wouldnt be asking for it?
Interesting how you are all about reading between the lines when it comes to Armstrong...but anything like that about other riders you are quick to dismiss.
18hockey is offline