Old 02-11-12, 05:04 AM
  #4  
roadwarrior
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Danielle
You know, I've been thinking about this all week now. Let's as an example say you have a 30 inch inseam. Nice round number for mathematical purposes. By these formulas that we have ( I know they are only a starting point) they have you either adding 9% to you inseam by the 109% method. This would put you at 32.7 inches of total saddle height to the pedals. The .883 method puts you at 90% to the bb + another 17cm for crank length, assuming you are using 170's. This puts you at 26.5 inches from saddle to bb + 6.69 inches for crank length. This puts you at a total height of 33.9.

Now my simple question. Where are these extra inches coming from? What I'm sayin is if your inseam is 30, how can the body extend the legs to 33 inches comfortably?
Because pants generally do not fit your crotch like a bike seat hits it, nor do pants go all the way to the bottom of your foot lest you trip on the cuff.
roadwarrior is offline