View Single Post
Old 02-16-12 | 08:24 AM
  #19  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Andrew R Stewart
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,381
Likes: 5,527
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Originally Posted by fietsbob
being a triangle the rear end does not flex much, .. unless like Richey or Hetchens,
you make the tubes not straight, so there is some bending,
rather than straight down the tube compression.
I don't completely agree here. But you point about no compression in a straight tube VS a curved tube is mostly right. But some of my comments had to do with the length of the rear triangle and where the load is WRT your butt. The further rearward of your butt the load enters the rear triangle the less displacement you feel.

On another fitting aspect the amount of seat set back will effect the weight you feel on your hands. (Somewhat independent of your reach length). When you butt (I love that word) is well positioned above (and behind by the "right" amount) your feet you can support your upper body with your core and not only your arms/upper body. The way my boss shows this is to ask riders to go from the hoods to letting go and sitting upright. With poor core usage one tends to push back with their hands as they sit up. With good positioning that employs your core the sitting up motion is fluid and needs no help from your arms. Additionally when dropping back down to the bars the motion is not one of "falling" and "catching. It took some wrapping of my mind around this idea but I've seen it during fitting sessions many times. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Reply