Originally Posted by zwxetlp
What a complete bunch of whiney a55 bull5h1t.
In any U.S.A. city i've been in, you can get a ticket for walking against a red. Why do you think just because you're on a bike you're exempt?
FWIW, I have run reds, I accept the potential consequences.
If you want to get political (and you're reasonably <read: barely> smart), I'm really hope you all can find more important things to whine about.
Carl.
Yeah you CAN but until enforcement becomes regular on jaywalking, why make such a big deal about cyclists. Obviously if you get caught you get caught and have to accept the consequences. The question people are considering is whether its a) reasonable to hold cyclists to the same laws as cars (its clearly established in the laws that they ARE held, but that doesn't make it reasonable and b) why there is no enforcement on jaywalking but, according to the article, seemingly unfairly weighted enforcement aimed at cyclists (when compared to pedestrians and cars)