View Single Post
Old 02-27-12 | 05:36 PM
  #34  
wrk101's Avatar
wrk101
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,642
Likes: 1,106
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd
That's just the point, Bill. The chrome is more durable. It resists dings and scratches miles better than paint. That's why it's so often used where it is.

I'm not arguing that chrome protects the steel tubing better than paint on a bike left out in the weather. That's abuse and neglect. Durability does not imply "weatherproof" or "waterproof".
Yes, I should add that in my experience, chrome is definitely more durable in regards to chips and scratches. No comparison versus paint in that regard. Chrome fork legs and chrome stays are obvious examples, versus the painted versions. As to rust, other than the heavy Schwinns, I have found chrome much more susceptible to rust than paint. I have found this on bikes from several regions: Asia, USA, Italy and other European countries. Oversimplification, but the super low end bikes, notably entry level Schwinns, the chrome is near indestructible. I guess when the bike weighs 40 pounds, they laid it on really thick.

The other advantage to chrome is it is a quick sign of a good bike. 90% of the bikes with chrome stays and fork crowns are something good. There are exceptions of course.

And of course, IMHO, every C & V fan should own at least ONE chrome bike.

Last edited by wrk101; 02-27-12 at 05:40 PM.
wrk101 is offline  
Reply