I don't think we're really disagreeing much. I agree that DOs gain from being chromed and that chrome is more durable for that purpose. Where I don't agree is for a whole fork or frame...I've had the same experiences as Bill. I have more issues with chrome pitting and it's harder to address.

I think where the car analogy fails is in the thickness of the plating...in the real world of bike use, chrome is pretty thin and I'd argue, from experience, that poor, thin, chrome is the rule...not the exception.

At a guess, one of the differences derives from the kinds of bikes we like. I like 80s and 90s road bikes. The chrome is thin and light. Col likes heavier Schwinns with heavier, more durable, plating. I'd argue that the majority of chrome to bikes and forks is aesthetic.