Old 03-08-12 | 01:31 PM
  #65  
bikingshearer's Avatar
bikingshearer
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 4,251
From: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

Friction shifting is good. With decent equipment, it works just fine. I do like the clean look of DT shifters. And it is not a bad thing for everyone to have some experience with it - kind of like knowing how to drive a stick makes one better able to use an automatic to best advantage.

But properly set up Ergo is better. I want to shift, not think about shifting. And I like Ergo over STI because I want to be able to trim the FD.

The one place I'll sort of disagree is on a fully loaded touring bike. For that, I want Shimano barcons that can be set either to indexed or friction. I can still shift with both hands on the bar (with 40+ lbs of gear on board, there are times when this is a very good, even crash-preventing, thing) and if somethng goes hinkey with the indexing for whatever reason, I can still keep going. And because it's Shimano, odds are good that I can get parts at a small-town bike shop.

Otherwise, it's Campy Ergo FTW.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Reply