FWIW- I think the little bit of time spent off topic in this thread showed the excellent qualities of both Randy and Tom. Notice that of all the people who assumed ill of Tom's question, Randy was not one of them. Randy's record obviously speaks for itself, and Tom has never in my eyes seemed the type to wantonly accuse a person of unethical activity. If he asks a question, it's just that- a question- asked in good will. (If he has something negative to say, I've certainly seen him say it plainly) Well done, Randy, all your work and for being a peaceful enough person to assume the best in others, and to Tom, for wanting to approach ethically a new situation.

Re: the OP- I only have three in queue, and that's already too much for me.

Edit: The above is in no way a criticism of those who perceived Randy as needing a "defense" and then doing so. That was cool, too, even if unnecessary.