Old 03-19-12 | 04:08 AM
  #28  
brianogilvie's Avatar
brianogilvie
Commuter & cyclotourist
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Hadley, MA, USA

Bikes: Boulder All Road, Surly Long Haul Trucker, Bike Friday New World Tourist, Breezer Uptown 8, Bike Friday Express Tikit, Trek MultiTrack 730 (Problem? No, I don't have a problem)

Originally Posted by SFGary
Hi brianogilvie, thanks, this is a comprehensive look at the 800. Have you looked at the eTrex Legend HCx/Vista HCx, the 20 and the 30? if you are looking just for the mapping features on a bike? Looks like the ACA forum guys use these over the expensive 800? I am trying to find out the difference. Is it just that the 800 includes a map and in the other products you have to enter the waypoints or is there some other distinct advantage with buying the 800? sorry for the deviation, OP...
If what you want is mapping, the eTrex series would be worth considering. They're slightly heavier than the 800, which weighs 3.5 oz (98 g), and they're bulkier, but the difference is minimal.

The Edge 800 is a cycle computer and training aid: it gives you a whole series of metrics (speed, average speed, lap speed, lap distance, total distance, total distance climbed, grade, and many, many more), it has a lap button for easily recording laps, it can be programmed with different workouts, and it also has the basic mapping and navigation functions. It's best to think of it as an Edge 500 plus mapping. Some of the other Garmin devices can be used with a heart rate monitor and cadence sensor, and have some of the same metrics (the Oregon series, for instance), so the line between cycle computer and GPS mapping unit is blurry, but there's still a difference in emphasis.
brianogilvie is offline  
Reply