That would be a PERFECT bike for long distances. It's just that it will take longer to cover that distance, because: a) it is so upright, (more susceptible to wind) b) since you're not leaning into the pedals, it seems like you have less pedal force available

My TriCross is what lots of folks here would consider good for longer distances. It's fast and has a sprung Brooks saddle. But after 40 miles, my wrists are starting to hurt. If I want to take in the scenery as I go, then my neck is starting to hurt too. These are the penalties for faster bikes.

For me, going to a bike like that from my TriCross would mean lowering my average pace from 15 mph to 13 mph or so.

I had a similar city bike before, and it got stolen last year. I miss it so much, I'm replacing it with the Schwinn in my siggy below. (another city bike)

I say go for it.