Originally Posted by
squirtdad
I always have a problem with this argument.... Because it ignores other consequences. Yes if a cyclist makes a wrong decision by running a red they have more exposure than a person in a car does, but it does not end there. You run a red light and make a judgement error. Now a driver either hits you and suffers psychological issues for something is not their fault or trys to avoid you and hits another car or object.
And god forbid that there was a crash, the cost of the police coming to make a report, paramedics going to the scene, etc.