Originally Posted by
chasm54
......Riding SS rather than fixed rather diminishes the perceived benefits, because you can coast rather than having to learn to spin at high revs. So you'll get nothing from doing so that you wouldn't get from just sticking your geared bike into the 39/14 and leaving it there for the duration.......
I have to agree with you for the most part because I have a flip-flip rear wheel and the only time I setup for SS is when I lending the bike to someone else, and if I don't want the regimen of the fixed gear I would just ride one my geared bikes, and even if I just wanted to to mash up hills and spin down them I would still probably do it on my geared bike. When I ride my geared bikes I normally monitor my speed, my cadence, my perceived workload (no power either), and my heartrate, but when I ride the fixed gear I generally pretty much ignore my cadence and my speed and instead I concentrate on my perceived workload, my heartrate, and my route, because my cadence and my speed are pretty much dictated by the other three.
Instead, when I choose to practice spinning on my fixed gear I choose a fairly flat route and I concentrate my workout on my cadence and my heartrate, and when I am doing intervals on my fixed gear I choose a hillier course and I concentrate my workout on my on a heartrate and power output. To me spinning and interval training are just two completely different types of workouts that require different types of routes when you do them on a fixed gear, but both types of workouts are done quite easily on a fixed gear, but that's just me.....
I don't see the likelihood of getting the same level of workout on a SS vs a FG however, because as you said, coasting pretty much negates the advantage of the FG.