Originally Posted by
MassiveD
You lost me at the Gates Drive. That thing is not really practical, and runs counter to other decisions like 26" wheels for wide parts availability. But your other decisions make a lot of sense and it looks like you have a really nice bike there.
You're right about belt drive possibly not being practical if I ever want to tour around the world in the near future (no immediate plans for that, btw.) I don't see, however, how it counters the decision to have a future-proof, multifunctional frame. Things could change very quickly in the future. There are already several touring bikes with belt drives. At NAHBS (which showcase trends that are to come), tons of builders have been making a splash with it over the last few years. Technology changes at a rapid pace. Disc brakes , for example, have now become really common down here. Another one is wheel size... even though 26" wheels still rule, the LBS here tells me 29ers are now really outselling 26" with high-end MTB customers. So, as far as Gates Belt Drive goes, it might be too early to tell if it's worth the investment, but does it hurt to have a frame ready for it?
Personally I would like to run two front brakes anyway. I have have brakes fail moderately on several tours. And I run the very best stuff, so I think it makes sense to have two front brakes for safety. More likely to save you than a helmet.
Interesting! But I have never seen a bike running two front brakes. What kind of brakes failed on you which led to install two front brakes? I guess the case scenario you mention would become eminent if two disc brakes failed (front & rear) on a major downhill. You get tons of stopping power even with just one of them. It's better to be safe than sorry. My frame is ready for V-brake or Canti brakes (front and rear) which are economical options in case of emergency or if I ever see myself wanting to switch to them.