Originally Posted by wyobiker
The point I am trying to make is that if they found remnants of any drugs even the smallest amount it should have the suspicion. But I haven't read anything that suggests that Lance even had a minute amount. That being said most of the discussion (and conviction) seems to based on guilt by association. IMHO
People don't take a small amount of a steroid for fun at a party like they would take a drink at a party and test 0.000001% or whatever.
Steroids aren't really for taking during a race as much as they are for training. The low amount is why some think it's a possibility that he may have taken a steroid in training weeks before the race, possibly after the Dauphine.
It has already been discussed that there are many doping products that cannot be tested for. Which means that they cannot pick up even a small amount.
Originally Posted by wyobiker
I am just amazed at the logic people are using to make the deduction that Lance is a doper. Here is my premise on all this BS.
A lot of the stuff talked about here is information. Yes, factual information. I didn't see any 'Armstrong dopes' declarations though.
We might as well not talk about whether or not OJ is guilty. Because he wasn't convicted, so we shouldn't ruin his reputation by saying maybe there is a chance he committed murder.