Originally Posted by
dougmc
Well, my memory of the case(s) may need refreshing, but I seem to recall more than one court case. I think he represented himself the first time, and then had a lawyer the second time (but still lost.)
If I'm right, then he probably had legitimate uses for any money donated for his defence. But don't rely on my memory.
If I recall correctly, the legal fund was for appeal when he did finally get a lawyer. So, yes, legitimate use of the funds trying to recover some protection of cyclist rights.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.