Originally Posted by
hagen2456
I've made my point twice now in relation to your statements. I think that must be enough.
But you have not made any point, not presented any argument, demonstrating that knowledge of how a process, in this case a traffic movement, is supposed to occur is irrelevant to detecting errors that might lead to a dangerous situation. I maintain that this knowledge is exceedingly helpful; you deny that this is so, without presenting any reasons for so believing.