Originally Posted by
SparksIT
I've seen the errors of my ways...I've test rode several more bikes, including Trek Hybrid, Trek DS, and the Giant Roam...If I want a mountain bike, I'll buy a mountain bike. I agree that going with a shocked front is unwise. I also test rode a the 7.2 FX bike, which was more enjoyable, though this time it was about a 20 minute ride. So I'm purchasing a Trek 7.2 FX or a 7.3 FX, and advantage one way or another? Is it worth the upgrade to disk brakes (apart from better stopping)?
I also test road a Scott Matrix for $600?
If you're referring to the Scott Metrix 30 and not the Metrix 20, then the Trek 7.2 is the better deal. For the small upgrade in componentry, the extra cash for the 7.3 FX, just might be worth it. However, if it adds any financial pressure, it's not worth it. Disc brakes are always a nice option, but definitely not necessary, unless you cycle during monsoon season somewhere with hills.
PS.
The Scott Metrix 30 for $600 is not a bad deal at all. If it's a Scott Metrix 20, grab it immediately!