View Single Post
Old 05-29-12, 03:03 PM
  #19  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by iab
Higher capital cost for carbon, but lower labor cost. In the long run, carbon is cheaper.

I have a steel bike that is 7.0kg. I have seen one that is 6.0kg. With a UCI weight limit of 6.8, weight is irrelevant.





And on a completely different note (and absolutely not directed to you or your post), I give this thread another 5 posts before it becomes a carbon sucks and steel is real thread.

Most likely my next bike will be a carbon fibre frame, with 33 steel ones in the shed, one Mod bike will not be too bad... And on that one I could care less about the UCI weight minimum, I'm going to go with whatever it ends up, my guess 12 lbs. about.
repechage is offline