View Single Post
Old 06-04-12 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
asgelle
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 507
From: Albuquerque, NM
Originally Posted by rushbikes
I made mention of rolling resistance in my post. It is considered close to nominal when compared with wind resistance. I do not recall the exact numbers (that calculator link probably distills them), but there have been plenty of posts in this forum supporting this.
Why not do the calculation and be done with it. http://www.analyticcycling.com/ForcesSource_Page.html

Rolling resistance using defaults, 304.5 gmf (2.98e5 dyne). So at 20 km/hr it takes 16.6 W to overcome rolling resistance; at 60 that grows to 49.8. Whether a difference of 33 W matters is up to the individual.
asgelle is offline  
Reply