Originally Posted by
Roadfrog
Agree. Other than weight, generally speaking, what is the advantage of carbon over a good steel bike?
Carbon can command a higher price, and (I presume but am not sure) a little higher profit margin.
Oh, you mean for the cyclist.

Compared to steel, weight is the biggie. CF also offers designers a little more control over tube shapes and maybe tube characteristics. So far, all the steel I've seen sticks to round or slightly oval tubing.
Nowadays, you can get almost all of the same advantages out of high-end aluminum, albeit with a 1-2 pound frame weight premium. IIRC several steel alloys can get close to aluminum for weight, but I don't know if you can hydroform steel to the same extent of as aluminum.