View Single Post
Old 06-13-12 | 07:01 AM
  #11  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mechanically there's little difference in function between various cage lengths of the same derailleur, so there's no problem with more cage than necessary, other than weight (the RD + a few extra chain links). So the only argument for shorter cages would seem to be the cool factor issue.

But there are subtle benefits to shorter cages. First, most makers use the same cage spring regardless of cage length. That means a shorter cage will wind the chain slightly tighter, which means a quieter ride, and less chainstay slap (when coasting) on bumpy roads. There's also better ground clearance which can be very helpful off road, and lastly if you often have to pack the bike in a box or car trunk, wheels off, it's more compact with a smaller RD, and the cage unit is a bit tougher agains abuse.

So overall, I feel that it's best to use the shortest cage derailleur that'll serve. Of course, those who might be expanding the gear range in the future might want to provide some cushion, and opt bigger.

I also have another reason for my short cage bias. I'm a minimalist. I don't use anythng more than necessary for the job in general, so the shortest cage possible fits in with my overall temperament.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply