View Single Post
Old 06-22-12 | 05:15 PM
  #53  
drbenjamin
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Redmond WA
Originally Posted by chasm54
It's true that a compact double with a big cassette will give you a similar range to the triple. But the triple is still the superior option, because you can achieve closer ratios and less shifting between chainrings.
Of course, superior is in the eye of the beholder, but I agree w/ chasm. Take a look at http://gear-calculator.com/#

it is a very nice tool and you can compare various front/rear gearing choices. I expect that I could tolerate the taller gearing at the low end, but the jumps between gears are very off-putting to me. I like pedaling at 90-95 rpm, and a triple with a 12-27 lets me be at 95, upshift, and be at 89-90. You can use the tool to figure out how to emulate a compact double setup using your triple; try it out on the bike and see how you feel about the 12% jumps. Clearly they don't bother a lot of folks but I really dislike them. Sadly, that means that 105 is the top-end groupset for me, Ultegra and Dura ace don't even offer triples any more.
drbenjamin is offline  
Reply