View Single Post
Old 07-10-12, 09:49 AM
  #21  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Plus intensity for the given time.

Last week, I spent 17 hours focusing on climbing in WV, but only covered 210 miles. Same time, with less effort, in Florida would have been over 350 miles.

Miles ridden is not a very useful measure.
It's as useful(useless) as time. Either one should have intensity attached to be most effective in tracking effort.

Over the course of a year tracking time and/or mileage is a useful metric for volume. My trainer miles are harder than outdoor miles so I count them. They only represent about 3% of my riding so it's not a big deal either way.
gregf83 is offline