View Single Post
Old 07-10-12, 11:00 AM
  #24  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,305

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1451 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times in 374 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Over the course of a year tracking time and/or mileage is a useful metric for volume. .
The example I gave shows why time is a much better metric for volume.

Given the variabilities of group versus solo, flat versus climbing, wind speed and direction, the same amount of time, even for a given effort, will produce wide swings in mileage.

Thus time is a more workable measure, and the reason training plans are almost always done on time rather than mileage.


Add in intensity, with either an hrm, or a power meter, and miles become pretty irrelevant.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline