View Single Post
Old 07-19-12, 06:00 AM
  #10  
MerriwetherII
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One way to compare road bikes and roller blades is as wheeled vehicles with the same engine but different transmissions. The main advantage of a road bike is that it has substantially more efficient gearing than a guy on roller blades. A way to put the point is that a roller blader is, transmission-wise, the rough equivalent of a cyclist on a fixed gear machine with a low gear, or, at least, a lower gear than is used by faster road bikers pushing along the flats.

Still, roller bladers are capable of some impressive speeds on the pavement, definitely.

A quick look at the world records for inline speed skating on the road here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inline_speed_skating#Road

The world record for 1k on the road is 77 seconds, which is 29 mph. The world record for 10k comes out to 27 mph.

These records are a little bit slower than the equivalent records for ice skating, which are 1k at ~33 mph and 10k at ~29 mph, but not by as much as I would have guessed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ng_records#Men

Good roller blades must be pretty efficient to come this close on pavement to blades on ice.

These are the world records, of course, so even a well-trained roller blader you might run into on an urban path will be significantly slower than this. Still, a well-trained blader on good blades can be expected to keep up impressive speeds on pavement for quite a while, Abhibeckert's 40kph being a striking case in point. So, yeah, some bladers will be faster than recreational cyclists or commuters cruising along.
MerriwetherII is offline