View Single Post
Old 07-23-12 | 04:08 PM
  #8  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
Now I am going to argue.

The beauty of the big/big method is it produces the shortest chain that will safely cover the big/big combination. That's important. If your chain is shorter than that, and you ever accidentally shift into the big/big, you can do serious damage to your bike in less time than it took me to type this sentence.
+1

The big/big +1" produces the MINIMUM chain length. If you're running a derailleur with excess wrap capacity, you can always go longer (as I do), but you can never go shorter. Over the years I've known too many knowledgeable riders who run derailleurs over capacity, and opted to pinch at the short end. Famous last words for drivetrains and rear hubs are "I never cross chain anyway".

If you run a derailleur over capacity pinch at the long end. The worst that can happen is you shift to small/small and the chain hangs down like a pregnant possum's belly. But nothing will break.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply