View Single Post
Old 07-25-12, 09:08 AM
  #34  
drmayer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ritterview


The Garmin Cadence/Speed sensor is much maligned as poorly designed, too expensive and too frail. A Garmin user will accumulate several of these over the years as they fail.

There is no alternative ANT+, save for the Bontrager DuoTrap Digital Speed/Cadence Sensor, which is proprietary for the chainstay on Trek bikes. Why Trek doesn't take the internals for this and put it in a general purpose model is beyond me. If anyone wants to design a cycling gizmo sure to sell, it would be a plastic mount for the Bontrager that would work on any chainstay.



The only other way to avoid a Garmin Cadence/Speed sensor is with a power meter. The Garmin Vector pedals will report cadence, so users can get away with only a ANT+ wheel sensor, which need not be Garmin's.
Bontrager makes an ANT+ speed/cadence sensor that is not the duotrap: http://bontrager.com/model/11323

Kind of expensive at $60, though. No zip ties needed.
drmayer is offline