Thanks for your thoughts.

I do agree that I'm more for traditional bicycles, and that is for the fact that it is a tried and true design. There are plenty of people who have biked across the world. I would bet over 95% have used a leather saddle and have come out healthy on the other side. I'm not saying your product is bad, and is certainly an alternative to people who are having some major fit issues, but it shouldn't be considered until you at least adjust what you have on the bike.

Furthermore, and this is coming from a long distance unicyclist (and biker). The lack of a nose certainly effects the handling of the bike in a negative way. This causes you to be slower overall to maintain stability. This is especially of concern to me when you are going downhill. At 35 miles an hour I tuck my legs in and hold onto the saddle with my legs. No nose and you could potentially slip off the saddle. This shouldn't be an issue for the casual rider as they won't be going that fast, but for the commuter it certainly will.

I understand you're backing your product. I understand that some people may have harsh opinions of it. I see it as a unique alternative that caters to the unique case. I think most cyclists do not have a need for such a product and that a normal bicycle seat is perfectly comfortable (and healthy). My suggestion to most people if they had that many issues with the comfort of their bicycle seat is to go get a nice entry level recumbent bicycle and never worry about a sore bum again.