View Single Post
Old 08-19-12, 05:50 PM
  #5  
chefisaac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: cherry hill, nj
Posts: 6,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chasm54
That won't do it for you. It will provide a guide, but conditions - temperature, fatigue and so on - make HR an unreliable method of assessing your calorie consumption. You'll find that different HRMs give widely different estimates of calorie consumption - even different models from the same manufacturer. My old Garmin 305, for example, typically gave a figure about 30% igher than the Garmin 500 I replaced it with, and even the 500 tends to be on the high side.

At my lactate threshold I burn about 15 kcal per minute. So 900kcal per hour is about as hard as I can go - and then only for one hour.
Notice I said "better way". HRM versus computer based no info type of estimation. For me, it is HRM.
chefisaac is offline